sorb/ThreadNet-Web
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases 4 Wiki Activity

Update all non-major dependencies (#28556)

Browse Source 
* Update all non-major dependencies

* Prettier

Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
renovate[bot]
2024-12-02 09:39:36 +00:00
committed by GitHub
co-authored by renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Michael Telatynski
parent 4f276c1690
commit 418f121f96
86 changed files with 820 additions and 926 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
CONTRIBUTING.md
+26 -26
View File
@@ -20,26 +20,26 @@ Definitely don't use the GitHub default of "Update file.ts".
As for your PR description, it should include these things:
- References to any bugs fixed by the change (in GitHub's `Fixes` notation)
- Describe the why and what is changing in the PR description so it's easy for
onlookers and reviewers to onboard and context switch. This information is
also helpful when we come back to look at this in 6 months and ask "why did
we do it like that?" we have a chance of finding out.
- Why didn't it work before? Why does it work now? What use cases does it
unlock?
- If you find yourself adding information on how the code works or why you
chose to do it the way you did, make sure this information is instead
written as comments in the code itself.
- Sometimes a PR can change considerably as it is developed. In this case,
the description should be updated to reflect the most recent state of
the PR. (It can be helpful to retain the old content under a suitable
heading, for additional context.)
- Include both **before** and **after** screenshots to easily compare and discuss
what's changing.
- Include a step-by-step testing strategy so that a reviewer can check out the
code locally and easily get to the point of testing your change.
- Add comments to the diff for the reviewer that might help them to understand
why the change is necessary or how they might better understand and review it.
- References to any bugs fixed by the change (in GitHub's `Fixes` notation)
- Describe the why and what is changing in the PR description so it's easy for
onlookers and reviewers to onboard and context switch. This information is
also helpful when we come back to look at this in 6 months and ask "why did
we do it like that?" we have a chance of finding out.
- Why didn't it work before? Why does it work now? What use cases does it
unlock?
- If you find yourself adding information on how the code works or why you
chose to do it the way you did, make sure this information is instead
written as comments in the code itself.
- Sometimes a PR can change considerably as it is developed. In this case,
the description should be updated to reflect the most recent state of
the PR. (It can be helpful to retain the old content under a suitable
heading, for additional context.)
- Include both **before** and **after** screenshots to easily compare and discuss
what's changing.
- Include a step-by-step testing strategy so that a reviewer can check out the
code locally and easily get to the point of testing your change.
- Add comments to the diff for the reviewer that might help them to understand
why the change is necessary or how they might better understand and review it.
### Changelogs
@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ element-web notes: Fix a bug where the 'Herd' button only worked on Tuesdays
This example is for Element Web. You can specify:
- element-web
- element-desktop
- element-web
- element-desktop
If your PR introduces a breaking change, use the `Notes` section in the same
way, additionally adding the `X-Breaking-Change` label (see below). There's no need
@@ -96,10 +96,10 @@ Notes: Remove legacy `Camelopard` class. `Giraffe` should be used instead.
Other metadata can be added using labels.
- `X-Breaking-Change`: A breaking change - adding this label will mean the change causes a _major_ version bump.
- `T-Enhancement`: A new feature - adding this label will mean the change causes a _minor_ version bump.
- `T-Defect`: A bug fix (in either code or docs).
- `T-Task`: No user-facing changes, eg. code comments, CI fixes, refactors or tests. Won't have a changelog entry unless you specify one.
- `X-Breaking-Change`: A breaking change - adding this label will mean the change causes a _major_ version bump.
- `T-Enhancement`: A new feature - adding this label will mean the change causes a _minor_ version bump.
- `T-Defect`: A bug fix (in either code or docs).
- `T-Task`: No user-facing changes, eg. code comments, CI fixes, refactors or tests. Won't have a changelog entry unless you specify one.
If you don't have permission to add labels, your PR reviewer(s) can work with you
to add them: ask in the PR description or comments.