docs(adr): ADR-0020 for the acknowledgement mechanism
The framework audit found this missing. Acknowledging known findings is a process decision about how the alarm system treats exceptions, and AGENTS.md is explicit that documenting an exception instead of deciding it is itself the error. It lived only inside #0104 and #0105, which are issues, not decision records. The ADR carries the reasoning the issues could not: why option C beat working the backlog down first or tolerating red, and why the obvious objection - an exception list is a candidate for the next blind spot - is answered by the three rules rather than waved away. It also records what is deliberately not acknowledged, the transient mirror divergence, because that message is the only signal if a mirror truly stops. One consequence is stated plainly rather than discovered later: acknowledgements bind to substrings of the finding text, so fixing or moving a cause can change the wording and require the entry to follow. Stable finding IDs would avoid that and would make the file unreadable without special knowledge; the trade is taken knowingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
84e87238f6
commit
8e653082b6
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ Spalte `pruefung`.
|
||||
| Ein *neu* eingeführter Befund färbt nachweislich rot | ✅ am Beispiel gezeigt, nicht abgeleitet |
|
||||
| Quittiertes bleibt sichtbar, mit Grund und Datum | ✅ |
|
||||
| Bedingung in AGENTS.md ergänzen | ⏳ **offen — braucht sorbs Zustimmung** |
|
||||
| Prozessentscheidung als ADR festgehalten | ✅ [ADR-0020](../adr/0020-bekannte-befunde-quittieren.md) |
|
||||
|
||||
Der letzte Punkt bleibt bewusst liegen: Änderungen an AGENTS.md werden nur mit
|
||||
sorb abgestimmt. Vorschlag für die Ergänzung neben „die rote Pipeline ist der
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user