# HANDOFF.md — Session 1 → Session 2

Everything Session 2 needs, and nothing else. Session 2 designs and builds the
neckbeard-based management system in a **new branch**, starting fresh from this file.

## Where things are

| | |
|---|---|
| Analysis branch | `Neckbeard-v0.1.1-analyse-1`, branched from `main` at `2f012a6` (renamed from `analysis/neckbeard-fieldtest` at session close, per the human) |
| Commits | `git log main..` on this branch lists them: scope, inventory, SHA/timestamps, findings, report/handoff, reach correction, verification pass |
| Deliverables | [SCOPE.md](SCOPE.md) · [REPORT.md](REPORT.md) · [findings/](findings/) (F-001…F-017) · [data/](data/) · [scripts/](scripts/) |
| Read first | REPORT.md executive summary, then the pattern → mechanism → implication table |
| Neckbeard reference | `v0.1.1` @ `823a08cac6b03a47d7e2f661200a49ac6e09d38d`, `main`, clean |

Nothing outside `analysis/` was modified on this branch. `main` is untouched.

## Reproducing the raw data from zero

```bash
git clone https://git.lab/axion1337.chat/management.git
cd management && git checkout Neckbeard-v0.1.1-analyse-1
bash analysis/scripts/run_all.sh
```

Clones the five component repos into `../components/` if absent, exports group issue
metadata from git.lab, regenerates everything under `analysis/data/`. Bash + python3
stdlib only, no pip installs. Requires lab/VPN access for the clone and the issue export;
both skip cleanly without it and the rest still runs. Override the checkout location with
`NB_WORKSPACE`.

**A second run on an unchanged tree must produce no diff.** Verified with
`diff -r` after a full regeneration. No wall-clock time enters any output: "days since"
is measured against the management repo's HEAD commit date (2026-08-09), not the clock.

`inv_repo.py` aborts the whole run if anything outside `analysis/` was modified. That
guard was tested by deliberately dirtying `README.md`; it fires.

## Scope, as frozen at the Phase-0 STOP

Five components, slugs verified against git.lab with `git ls-remote`, human-confirmed:

| Display name | Repo slug |
|---|---|
| ThreadNet Call | `threadnet-call` |
| ThreadNet Git | `thread-net-git` |
| ThreadNet Operating | `threadnet-operating` |
| ThreadNet Server Suite | `axion1337.chat-gitops` |
| ThreadNet Web | `ThreadNet-Web` |

Out of scope as analysis targets: `game-operating`, `gameserver`, the `vendor` and
`Archiv` subgroups. References into them are recorded as `points-outside-scope`.
The human confirmed their own working copy points at canonical git.lab, not the mirror.

## Decisions taken this session, and why

1. **Both repos freshly cloned; push URL set to `DISABLED-no-push` on every clone**,
   including clones `run_all.sh` creates. The mandate forbids modifying originals; making
   it mechanically impossible beats remembering not to.
2. **The management repo is inventoried at `main`, not at the analysis branch.** The first
   run counted this session's own commits and `analysis/` files as project reality (87
   commits instead of 86, 45 files instead of 44). An analysis that observes itself
   reports its own footprint as drift.
3. **Commits follow the repo's own convention** (`CLAUDE.md:116-134`): English,
   conventional style, author *and* committer date at 12:00:00 UTC, plus the mandated
   `analysis:` prefix. Not anonymising would have been drift this session introduced.
4. **The GitLab token is referenced by path, never read into output.** Per `CLAUDE.md:109`
   its value was not printed, logged or written anywhere; the export holds **metadata
   only** — no issue descriptions, no comments.
5. **All group issues exported, open and closed**, rather than an arbitrary
   "recently closed" cutoff. The group is small (111 issues); a full export is
   deterministic and needs no justification for where the line was drawn.
6. **`sha_refs.tsv` and `timestamp_anonymisation.tsv` were added** beyond the mandated file
   list, prompted by the human's question about the rebase mapping list. They carry the
   evidence for F-002, F-003, F-006, F-012 and F-015.
7. **Two tooling bugs were found and fixed mid-flight**, both of which would have produced
   false conclusions: `git grep -E '\b…'` silently reports **zero** markers because git's
   ERE has no `\b` (real count: 543), and a `TZ` that is not set on the `git` process
   itself makes every commit look non-anonymised.
8. **Link statuses stayed at the three mandated values**; the nuance moved into a `kind`
   column rather than inventing a fourth status.
9. **The claim sweep was completed inside Session 1**, after the human asked whether
   pulling it forward would break the two-session split. It does not: verifying claims is
   Phase-2 analysis work; only designing/fixing belongs to Session 2. Result: F-017 and
   the REPORT appendix.
10. **ADR-0010 exists as a draft under [drafts/](drafts/)**, not under `decisions/` —
    the human decided it is filed in the old scheme, but this session must not create
    files outside `analysis/`; placing it is one `git mv` by the human. Deliberately in
    German, matching the old scheme it belongs to (a stated deviation from this
    session's English-artifacts rule).
11. **Session-close corrections by the human**, both binding for Session 2: the Gitea
    mirror is **private to the owner**, not public (reach of F-002/F-003 rewritten —
    the exposure is prospective, via a possible future git.lab→GitHub push); canonical
    author identity is `Thore Cimbal <cfx@riot.8shield.net>` (F-003 addendum).

## Where Session 2 should start

**Standing directive from the human (session close):** before applying anything, work
through the failures of *both* approaches — the drift this report found in the
management approach *and* the seven neckbeard gaps it exposed — and where the old
approach carries value that fits neckbeard's philosophy (candidates are the four
works-well findings, the milestone/priority evidence in F-014, the mirror-topology
prose in F-013), fold that value into neckbeard rather than discarding it. Adoption
comes after that two-way harvest, not before.

The pattern → mechanism → implication table in REPORT.md is the input. Two things gate
everything else:

- **Question 1 in REPORT.md** — where the 71 open issues live after migration. ADR-0002
  Option C versus pure Option B changes the shape of the whole design.
- **Neckbeard gap 1** — how five repos share one `AGENTS.md`. Unanswered, this blocks any
  multi-repo adoption.

Neckbeard's own rules for Session 2: `PROJECT.md` is absent from the management repo, so
**Gate 0 fires there** (`AGENTS.md:57-63`) — it was suspended for this session only. The
migration is size L, so `WORKFLOW.md` Gates 1–5 with a design doc in `docs/design/` apply.

## The decisions I am least confident about

In descending order of how much they could mislead Session 2.

1. **The claim sweep is complete mechanically, not semantically.** Every one of the 813
   rows now has a disposition (REPORT appendix), and all 28 mechanical failures were
   adjudicated by hand. What remains open is honest but real: 360 rows carry no
   mechanically checkable token — their truth is prose about hosts, procedures and
   history that only a human or a live system can judge. And extraction itself is still
   trigger-based: a false sentence containing no path, issue, ID, date, count or
   status word was never in `claims.tsv` to begin with.
2. **`git ls-remote` against `rohana.axion1337.de/sorb/<name>` is how I concluded
   `game-operating` has no mirror** (F-007). That rests on the naming convention holding,
   which I verified for six repos but cannot prove for the seventh. The contradiction
   between `CLAUDE.md:36` and `hosts/overmind.md:28` is solid; the cause is not.
3. **F-009 and F-010 are judgement calls, marked `medium`.** "Doc attention should follow
   work mass" assumes dormancy is unintended, and a "Stand" label may legitimately mean
   "system state as last verified" rather than "state of this text". Both could be
   dismissed by an answer I do not have.
4. **The severity I assigned to F-002/F-003.** I first called the Gitea mirror public,
   inferring it from an anonymous `git ls-remote` succeeding on the owner's machine. The
   human corrected this: the host is private to them. The findings were rewritten; the
   exposure is prospective (a future push from git.lab to GitHub) rather than realised.
   The severity ranking still puts F-002 first, on the argument that a protection believed
   present but absent is what makes a later outward push unsafe. That weighting is mine
   and is contestable.
5. **F-011's confidence is `medium` because the sentence is ambiguous.** "Projekt-Repos
   haben eigene CLAUDE.mds" may be descriptive rather than a claim about all five. I read
   it as a claim because the sentence goes on to define conflict resolution against it.
6. **I did not verify claims made inside issue bodies.** `CLAUDE.md:52` says the migration
   footnote *in the issue* is authoritative for shifted gitops numbers — so the one source
   that could settle F-005's numbering question is the one I deliberately did not export.
7. **`markers.tsv` was produced and then barely used.** 543 markers, 538 of them inherited
   upstream. I recorded "management: 0 markers, checked, no drift found" and moved on. If
   technical debt in the components matters to Session 2, that file is unmined.