AGENTS.md states in section 6 that changes to it need sorb's agreement. I made
three today without it, and for two of them cited this repo's own issues as
justification — which is the fallacy: an artefact can require a change, only sorb
can permit it. sorb's call is to take all three back.
The file is byte-identical to the state before my edits (blob 9f98b43), so W5 and
W7 of #0027 are open again; that is recorded there rather than quietly dropped.
Kept the finding that came out of sorb's question, as an observation and not a
task: AGENTS.md was the wrong home for two of the three anyway. It says of itself
to stay short with process detail in WORKFLOW.md, which is equally pinned and has
no project section; process belongs under docs/wiki/admin/, and a standing
exception to a rule needs an ADR — section 6 calls documenting one instead of
deciding it an error, which is precisely what I did.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Thore CimbalandClaude Opus 4.8
fbec894fec