netpol: MAS reaches Synapse through haproxy now, and the rule did not know it
Until ESS 26.4.0 the auth service pointed straight at matrix-stack-synapse-main, which allow-ingress-synapse permits, so nothing was needed here. ESS 26.8.0 moves matrix.endpoint to the haproxy service — and MAS walked into the default-deny. Login broke with 500 'failed to provision device' on /oauth2/token. The rule was mine, from #0088 this morning. It named who may reach haproxy, and the list was complete for the topology of that hour. A chart decided otherwise six hours later.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -109,6 +109,23 @@ spec:
|
||||
port: haproxy-403
|
||||
- protocol: TCP
|
||||
port: haproxy-wkd
|
||||
# Matrix Authentication Service ruft Synapse ueber haproxy.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# ⚠️ Bis ESS 26.4.0 zeigte MAS DIREKT auf matrix-stack-synapse-main; dorthin
|
||||
# erlaubt allow-ingress-synapse den Zugriff, hier war nichts noetig. ESS 26.8.0
|
||||
# stellt matrix.endpoint auf den haproxy-Dienst matrix-stack-synapse um - und
|
||||
# damit lief MAS in die default-deny-Regel. Folge: /oauth2/token antwortete mit
|
||||
# 500 'failed to provision device', die Anmeldung brach ab (2026-08-21, #0051).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Die Lehre steht im AAR: Eine Regel, die auf einen Dienstnamen zeigt, haengt an
|
||||
# einer Entscheidung des Charts, nicht an unserer.
|
||||
- from:
|
||||
- podSelector:
|
||||
matchLabels:
|
||||
app.kubernetes.io/name: matrix-authentication-service
|
||||
ports:
|
||||
- protocol: TCP
|
||||
port: haproxy-synapse
|
||||
# Draupnir (Issue #18) calls Synapse's client-server API directly, in-namespace -
|
||||
# without this it would be silently blocked by the default-deny policy.
|
||||
- from:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user