Asked whether the work was documented per the framework, the honest answer was
no. The judge reports 26 findings across the three ledgers written in the later
part of today — and it had never been run on any of them. The four from the
earlier part are clean, so this is a regression in form during the session, not
a misunderstanding of it.
Two systematic errors. Gates were listed newest first, while the template says
one row per gate as it closes and the judge checks ascending order. And ladder
rows carrying a reused outcome were left with an empty commit column, which a
closed ledger counts as pending — the rung's commit is the one its result landed
in, and now says so.
The third was mine alone: a gate 5 row for a gate that has not closed. A row
without a commit is a claim without evidence, which is the one thing a ledger
exists to prevent. It is gone; what is still owed stands in the notes instead.
All seven ledgers now pass at zero findings.
Thore Cimbal
ea13f71ac6