W2 was already covered — the ping trap lives in the textbloecke, and the firewall exception is conditional. W3 fixed: cfgmon.md listed the runner as running though it was dismantled on 2026-08-01; row removed and, rather than leaving the open question, the page now states that the service table is current state while the sections below are history. W6: addendum practice had proven itself twice but was undefined, so the AAR template now makes it a rule — append-only and dated, so the original mistake stays readable. W7: ADR-0009 unified the identities but AGENTS.md only said 'canonical author identity' without naming it; now spelled out. W1, W4, W5 and W8 need sorb's decision and are written up with what each one costs if left alone — W8 (root SSH on the gateway) being the sharpest. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
49 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: aar
|
|
status: open # open | harvested
|
|
date: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
related: [] # design docs, issues, ADRs involved
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
<!-- Copy to docs/aar/YYYY-MM-DD-slug.md. Delete comments when filling in.
|
|
Standalone AARs are for incidents and major deviations only —
|
|
normal undertakings get their AAR as Gate 5 inside the design doc. -->
|
|
|
|
# AAR: Title
|
|
|
|
## What was planned / expected
|
|
|
|
## What happened
|
|
|
|
<!-- Facts and timeline, not blame. -->
|
|
|
|
## Why the difference
|
|
|
|
<!-- Root cause. For failures, name the routing class:
|
|
intent issue / spec issue / code issue. -->
|
|
|
|
## Learnings
|
|
|
|
<!-- What future-you should know. Blunt beats polite. -->
|
|
|
|
## Actions
|
|
|
|
<!-- Concrete: wiki pages updated (FAQ, Stolpersteine) with links,
|
|
framework issues opened, tests added. When all actions are done,
|
|
set status: harvested. The refinement session walks all AARs
|
|
still marked open. -->
|
|
|
|
<!-- ## Nachtrag YYYY-MM-DD — <Thema> (optional, append-only)
|
|
|
|
Nachträge sind erlaubt und haben sich bewährt (Korrekturen, spätere
|
|
Auflösung eines offenen Punktes). Regeln:
|
|
- ANHÄNGEN, nie oben im Text nachbessern: der ursprüngliche Stand bleibt
|
|
lesbar, sonst verschwindet genau der Irrtum, aus dem man lernen wollte.
|
|
- Datiert überschreiben und benennen, was sich geändert hat.
|
|
- Widerspricht ein Nachtrag einer früheren Aussage, dort einen Verweis
|
|
setzen ("→ korrigiert im Nachtrag vom …") statt sie umzuschreiben.
|
|
- Befunde-Tabellen dürfen nachträglich um Issue-Referenzen ergänzt werden
|
|
(reine Vervollständigung, kein Nachtrag nötig).
|
|
Wächst ein AAR über ~drei Nachträge hinaus, gehört das Thema in ein
|
|
eigenes Folge-AAR statt in den vierten Anhang. -->
|